|
|
Review submitted by rob  on September 4, 2008 - 23:02. [nid:648]
|
|
Benchmark: Real ITSM 1.2 Service Demand | RATS Reckoning: | 50% from 16 | |
|
|
|
|
Divert new services to better fit IT requirements: No
|
Have formal SLAs and argue over SLAs on a regular basis with customers: No
|
|
|
Design for the lowest availability level that will be tolerated by the customer: Yes
|
Do not plan or rehearse for service discontinuities unless pressure from auditors becomes intolerable: Yes
|
Treat capacity planning and monitoring as pointless: Yes
|
Minimise security infrastructure investment except under threat of losing compliance or failing audit: Yes
|
Wait for service discontinuities and/or design services to ensure a suitable discontinuity within a reasonable timeframe: Yes
|
Bonus: Wait until after this happens: Yes
|
Perform occasional forensic security audits from within IT: No
|
Have a system to allocate vendor contacts: No
|
Bonus: Rotate contacts to share the value: No
|
Seek to be a reference site for all purchases: No
|
Encourage outsourcing in the appropriate situations: No
|

|
|
Comments
Post new comment